SMJ Current Issue


 
ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 
Sub-optimal postprandial blood glucose level in diabetics attending the outpatient clinic of a University Hospital
 
  Daad H. Akbar
 
ABSTRACT
 

Objectives: To determine the frequency of diabetic patients who attained the optimal postprandial blood glucose level.
 
Methods: Cross-sectional study of type-2 diabetic patients being followed at the medical outpatient clinic of King Abdul-Aziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, from January 1999 to December 2001. Patients were classified according to postprandial blood glucose level into 3-categories; group-1 (<9mmol/l), group-2 (9.1-10 mmol/l), group-3 (>10 mmol/l). Other data such as age, sex, duration of diabetes, presence of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, smoking, obesity, ischemic heart disease was recorded as well as mortality.
 
Results: A total of 443 patients were studied with mean age of 55 years and equal male to female ratio. The mean 2-hour postprandial blood glucose level was 14 mmol/l. The majority of patients were in group-3 (71%), while group-1 was 22% and group-2 was 7%. Patients with high 2-hour postprandial blood glucose (group-3) have a higher prevalence of hypertension [120/315 (38%) versus 31/97 (32%) p=0.01], hyperlipidemia [72/315 (23%) versus 13/97 (13%) p=0.02], obesity [79/315 (25%) versus 18/97 (19%) p=0.04], ischemic heart disease [72/315 (23%) versus 16/97 (17%) p=0.04] and mortality [35/315 (11%) versus 8/97 (8%) p=0.06] compared to those with controlled level (group-1).
 
Conclusions: A low frequency of diabetics attained the optimal 2-hour postprandial blood glucose level. Action should be taken on this crucial issue for the optimal management of diabetes.

 
 
Saudi Medical Journal 2003; Vol. 24 (10): 1109-1112
 

 

Diabetes mellitus has recently been classified as a major independent risk factor for the development of coronary heart disease.1 Patients with diabetes have increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Diabetic patients without previous myocardial infarction have outcomes similar to non-diabetic patients who have a previous myocardial infarction.2 The importance of postprandial blood glucose is evident in the literature. Postprandial hyperglycemia (PPH) has been associated with increased risk of microvascular and macrovascular complications.3-7 The Diabetes Intervention Study had showed that PPH was an independent risk factor for myocardial infarction and cardiac death.8 We aim in our study to determine the frequency of diabetic patients, attending the outpatient medical clinic of King Abdul-Aziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA), with optimal postprandial blood glucose level.

Methods. A cross-sectional study in which type-2 diabetic patients being followed in the outpatient medical clinic of King Abdul-Aziz University Hospital, Jeddah, KSA, from January 1999 to December 2001 were studied. The mean level of the last 2 fasting and 2-hours postprandial blood glucose (which were measured on an average of 6-12 weeks apart) was recorded. According to the expert committee report of the American Diabetes Association in 1999,9 the goal 2-hour postprandial blood glucose has to be 160 mg/dl (8.8 mmol/l) and action should be taken if it reaches 180 mg/dl (10 mmol/l); for fasting it is 120mg/dl (6.6 mmol/l) with action to be taken if it reaches 140 mg/dl (7.7 mmol/l). In 2002 a recommendation for a wider range for fasting 90-130 mg/dl (5-7 mmol/l)] was proposed and action suggested if it reached >150 mg/dl (8.3 mmol/l) and for bed time glucose it was 110-150 mg/dl (6-8.3mmol/l) and >180mg/dl (10 mmol/l).10 As we are using mmol/l unit for the measurement of plasma glucose in our hospital we classify the patients according to the 2-hours postprandial blood glucose level into 3-categories; goal <9 mmol/l, border line 9.1-10 mmol/l, poor >10 mmol/l. while for fasting; goal <7 mmol/l, borderline 7.1-8 mmol/l, poor >8 mmol/l. The following data was also collected from the study group; age, sex, body mass index (BMI), duration of diabetes, type of treatment (diet, oral hypoglycemic agents, insulin or combined), presence of hypertension (defined as blood pressure >140/90 mm Hg or if the patient is known hypertensive), hyperlipidemia (defined as low density lipoprotein (LDL) >2.6 mmol/l, high density lipoprotein (HDL) <1.1 mmol/l, triglyceride >1.7 mmol/l), history of smoking, history of ischemic heart disease (assessed by patient’s history or changes on electrophysiological studies), and mortality. The frequency of diabetic patients in each group was calculated, and the relations between them and cardiovascular risk factors and mortality were determined. Statistical analysis was carried out using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences 9.1 software. Values as mean + standard deviation were given for quantitative data and frequency for categorical variables. Chi-square was used to analyze group differences for categorical variables. For continuous variables t- test was used when comparing 2 groups. P-value <0.05 was considered significant.

Results. A total of 443 patients were enrolled in the study. Out of which 217 (49%) were males. The mean age was 54.8 ± 16.2 years and the mean BMI 25.5 ± 3.6 m2/kg. Two hundred and seventy (61% were on oral hypoglycemic agents, 133/443 (30%) on insulin, 27/443(6%) on diet and 13/443 (3%) on combined treatment. The mean fasting blood glucose for the study group was 9.7 ± 3.2 mmol/l while for 2-hour postpran

 

From the Department of Medicine, King Abdul-Aziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Received 12th May 2003. Accepted for publication in final form 5th July 2003.

Address correspondence and reprint request to: Dr. Daad H. Akbar, Associate Professor/Consultant Physician, PO Box 115652, Jeddah 21381, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Tel. +966 55604854. Fax. +966 (2) 6944857. E-mail: daadakb@yahoo.com

 

References

1. Grundy SM, Benjamin IJ, Burke GL, Chait A, Eckel RH, Howard B, et al. Diabetes and cardiovascular disease: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association. Circulation 1999; 100: 1134-1146.

2. Haffner SM, Lehto S, Ronnemaa T, Pyorala K, Laakso M. Mortality from coronary artery disease in subjects with type 2 diabetes and in nondiabetic subjects with and without prior myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1998; 339: 229-234.

3. de Veciana M, Major CA, Morgan MA, Asrat T, Toohey JS, Lien JM, et al. Postprandial versus preprandial blood glucose monitoring in women with gestational diabetes mellitus requiring insulin therapy. N Engl J Med 1995; 333: 1237-1241.

4. McCance DR, Hanson RL, Charles M, Jacobsson LT, Pettitt DJ, Bennett PH, et al. Comparison of tests for glycated haemoglobin and fasting and two hour plasma glucose concentrations in diagnostic methods for diabetes. BMJ 1994; 308: 1323-1328.

5. Engelgau MM, Thompson TJ, Herman WH, Boyle JP, Aubert RE, Kenny SJ, et al. Comparison of fasting and 2-hour glucose and HbA1c levels for diagnosing diabetes: diagnostic criteria and performance revisited. Diabetes Care 1997; 20: 785-791.

6. Lowe LP, Liu K, Greenland P, Metzger BE, Dyer AR, Stamler J. Diabetes, asymptomatic hyperglycemia, and 22-year mortality in black and white men: the Chicago Heart Association Detection Project in Industry Study. Diabetes Care 1997; 20: 163-169.

7. Donahue RP, Abbott RD, Reed DM, Yano K. Postchallenge glucose concentration and coronary heart disease in men of Japanese ancestry: Honolulu Heart Program. Diabetes 1987; 36: 689-692.

8. Hanefeld M, Temelkova-Kurktschiev T. The postprandial state and the risk of atherosclerosis. Diabet Med 1997; 4 Suppl 3: S6-S11.

9. American Diabetes Association: clinical practice recommendations 1999. Diabetes Care 1999; 22 Suppl 1: S1-114.

10. American Diabetes Association: clinical practice recommendations 2002. Diabetes Care 2002; 25 Suppl 1: S1-147.

11. McGuire DK, Granger CB. Diabetes and ischemic heart disease. Am Heart J 1999; 138: S366-S375.

12. Gu K, Cowie CC, Harris MI. Diabetes and decline in heart disease mortality in US adults. JAMA 1999; 281: 1291-1297.

13. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) Study Group. The effect of intensive diabetes therapy on measures of autonomic nervous system function in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT). Diabetologia 1998; 41: 416-423.

14. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet 1998; 352: 837-853.

15. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) Study Group. The absence of a glycemic threshold for the development of long-term complications: the perspective of the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Diabetes 1996; 45: 1289-1298.

16. Ohkubo Y, Kishikawa H, Araki E, Miyata T, Isami S, Motoyoshi S, et al. Intensive insulin therapy prevents the progression of diabetic microvascular complications in Japanese patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: a randomized prospective 6-year study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 1995; 28: 103-117.

17. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) Study Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 977-986.

18. Balkau B, Bertrais S, Ducimetiere P, Eschwege E. Is there a glycemic threshold for mortality risk? Diabetes Care 1999; 22: 696-699.

19. de Vegt F, Dekker JM, Ruhe HG, Stehouwer CD, Nijpels G, Bouter LM, et al. Hyperglycaemia is<



Saudi Medical Journal is copyright under the Berne Convention and the International Copyright Convention. All rights reserved. Electronic ISSN 1658-3175. Print ISSN 0379-5284.